Our Team Defends Insurance Agents Who Sold 419 and 412i Benefit Plans
Our team of experienced consulting "tax attorneys", CPAs, and "insurance experts" specializing in 412i" and "419 "IRS
audits" that resulted from plans you sold to your clients, mainly "419 plans", "412i plans", "captive insurance" plans
and "Section 79" plans as well as other similar "employee benefit plans" or "welfare benefit plans" that the IRS is
targeting as "abusive tax shelters".
Insurance Agents: Help for those who sold 419 and 412i plans.
Regaining The Lost Confidentiality of Off-Shore Trusts & Consumer's Guide To Swiss Annuities
September 21, 2009
By: Lance Wallach
Trusts have been with us forever. In fact, the first trusts date back from England during the time of the Crusades.
Off-shore Trusts are as the name implies, a trust established in a country other than where you are domiciled. They are established for many reasons, including investment confidentiality and asset protection. However, whatever the reasons, without confidentiality their value is negligible.
In establishing an off-shore trust, the client's attorney prepares a trust document, generally tailored to a specific off-shore jurisdiction. Next, a trust company is hired to administer the trust. The trust company then opens up a custodial account at a bank who is then notified that the owner of the account is the trust.
Indeed, that was how it used to work. Today, in jurisdiction after jurisdiction, the custodial bank is required to know who the beneficial owner of the trust is. That's right! Banks are no longer satisfied with the name of the trust but need a written statement from the trustee as to who is behind the trust and who in fact is the beneficial owner.
Why is this happening? It is a combination of pressure from the United States, the European Union and the general war on terrorism.
Some people think they can string one off-shore corporation owning another and owning another and so on, thinking they have achieved confidentiality. Actually, they have achieved nothing of the kind. At the end of the line of corporations, the bank must know who is the ultimate beneficial owner.
Having the bank know who the beneficial owner is opens up a whole new avenue of attack for creditors. If they can follow funds to the bank and get a court order to find out who the beneficial owner is, all of one's asset protection strategies may well be for naught. Americans are especially vulnerable as the Federal Courts have shown an increasing hostility to off-shore trusts when used as asset protection devices.
The Swiss Annuity Solution
Trust settlers and trust companies along with their advisors are turning increasingly to Swiss private placement annuities as a solution to the issue of just who is the beneficial owner of assets. But how can a Swiss annuity solve the problem of disclosing beneficial ownership?
The answer is simple: The Swiss annuity becomes the beneficial owner of the assets. The annuity policy then gives the policy owner the right of significant control without ownership. Here is how it works:
* An application is submitted to the Swiss insurer (or its Liechtenstein subsidiary).
* The insurer conducts its due diligence on the applicant.
* The applicant is accepted
* The client transfers the assets into the annuity.
* The funds, while an asset of the insurer, are placed in a separate account and held by a custodian bank.
* The client requests the insurer to appoint an investment manager to manage the funds.
Who is the beneficial owner of these assets? The answer again is simple: the insurance company, because there has been a separation of ownership and control. By transferring the assets to the insurer, the client is paying a premium. In exchange for the premium the insurer gives the client an annuity policy, which in turn gives the client certain rights of control to the assets held by the insurer. For example, the client can make withdrawals at any time he chooses.
To be qualified for IRS purposes, there are certain specific rules that must be followed. The client cannot directly manage the assets. They must be managed by an investment manager. The most that the client can do is meet with the investment manager and establish the basic strategy for the portfolio. In addition, there are diversification rules that must be followed. While almost any asset can be placed inside a Swiss private placement annuity, there are however certain limitations. For example, one cannot place within the annuity, a business where one works or the home in which one lives.
On account of the Swiss insurers not being licensed in the U.S., clients need travel outside of the country to sign the application. Of course, it is perfectly legal for Americans to purchase annuities or insurance anywhere in the world.
Swiss Annuities and Asset Protection
Swiss annuities contain, as a matter of Swiss law, significant asset protection features.
After the policy has been in force for one year, it is virtually impossible for a creditor to prove fraudulent conveyance, because to do so, the creditor would need to prove fraudulent intent on the part of both the policy owner and the primary beneficiary.
If a policy owner is adjudged bankrupt, under Swiss law he or she looses all control over the policy. These rights devolve to the primary beneficiary. The only condition is that the primary beneficiary must be either the spouse, child(ren) or grandchild(ren) of the policy owner. As soon as the insurer has knowledge that the policy owner is bankrupt, they are prohibited under Swiss law from accepting any instructions from him. Once released from bankruptcy, the policy owner's full rights under the policy are restored.
In addition, it is important to note that with regard to lawsuits, Switzerland is a looser pays jurisdiction. If someone brings a suit against your policy, not only will the insurer be responsible for its legal defense, but the loosing party must pay the winner's legal fees.
In this article I have given only a broad brush treatment to Swiss private placement annuities.
------------------------------------------------------------------
By: Lance Wallach
Trusts have been with us forever. In fact, the first trusts date back from England during the time of the Crusades.
Off-shore Trusts are as the name implies, a trust established in a country other than where you are domiciled. They are established for many reasons, including investment confidentiality and asset protection. However, whatever the reasons, without confidentiality their value is negligible.
In establishing an off-shore trust, the client's attorney prepares a trust document, generally tailored to a specific off-shore jurisdiction. Next, a trust company is hired to administer the trust. The trust company then opens up a custodial account at a bank who is then notified that the owner of the account is the trust.
Indeed, that was how it used to work. Today, in jurisdiction after jurisdiction, the custodial bank is required to know who the beneficial owner of the trust is. That's right! Banks are no longer satisfied with the name of the trust but need a written statement from the trustee as to who is behind the trust and who in fact is the beneficial owner.
Why is this happening? It is a combination of pressure from the United States, the European Union and the general war on terrorism.
Some people think they can string one off-shore corporation owning another and owning another and so on, thinking they have achieved confidentiality. Actually, they have achieved nothing of the kind. At the end of the line of corporations, the bank must know who is the ultimate beneficial owner.
Having the bank know who the beneficial owner is opens up a whole new avenue of attack for creditors. If they can follow funds to the bank and get a court order to find out who the beneficial owner is, all of one's asset protection strategies may well be for naught. Americans are especially vulnerable as the Federal Courts have shown an increasing hostility to off-shore trusts when used as asset protection devices.
The Swiss Annuity Solution
Trust settlers and trust companies along with their advisors are turning increasingly to Swiss private placement annuities as a solution to the issue of just who is the beneficial owner of assets. But how can a Swiss annuity solve the problem of disclosing beneficial ownership?
The answer is simple: The Swiss annuity becomes the beneficial owner of the assets. The annuity policy then gives the policy owner the right of significant control without ownership. Here is how it works:
* An application is submitted to the Swiss insurer (or its Liechtenstein subsidiary).
* The insurer conducts its due diligence on the applicant.
* The applicant is accepted
* The client transfers the assets into the annuity.
* The funds, while an asset of the insurer, are placed in a separate account and held by a custodian bank.
* The client requests the insurer to appoint an investment manager to manage the funds.
Who is the beneficial owner of these assets? The answer again is simple: the insurance company, because there has been a separation of ownership and control. By transferring the assets to the insurer, the client is paying a premium. In exchange for the premium the insurer gives the client an annuity policy, which in turn gives the client certain rights of control to the assets held by the insurer. For example, the client can make withdrawals at any time he chooses.
To be qualified for IRS purposes, there are certain specific rules that must be followed. The client cannot directly manage the assets. They must be managed by an investment manager. The most that the client can do is meet with the investment manager and establish the basic strategy for the portfolio. In addition, there are diversification rules that must be followed. While almost any asset can be placed inside a Swiss private placement annuity, there are however certain limitations. For example, one cannot place within the annuity, a business where one works or the home in which one lives.
On account of the Swiss insurers not being licensed in the U.S., clients need travel outside of the country to sign the application. Of course, it is perfectly legal for Americans to purchase annuities or insurance anywhere in the world.
Swiss Annuities and Asset Protection
Swiss annuities contain, as a matter of Swiss law, significant asset protection features.
After the policy has been in force for one year, it is virtually impossible for a creditor to prove fraudulent conveyance, because to do so, the creditor would need to prove fraudulent intent on the part of both the policy owner and the primary beneficiary.
If a policy owner is adjudged bankrupt, under Swiss law he or she looses all control over the policy. These rights devolve to the primary beneficiary. The only condition is that the primary beneficiary must be either the spouse, child(ren) or grandchild(ren) of the policy owner. As soon as the insurer has knowledge that the policy owner is bankrupt, they are prohibited under Swiss law from accepting any instructions from him. Once released from bankruptcy, the policy owner's full rights under the policy are restored.
In addition, it is important to note that with regard to lawsuits, Switzerland is a looser pays jurisdiction. If someone brings a suit against your policy, not only will the insurer be responsible for its legal defense, but the loosing party must pay the winner's legal fees.
In this article I have given only a broad brush treatment to Swiss private placement annuities.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)